|
|
Sixteenth
Sunday in Ordinary Time - Year A
July 17, 2005
Catechist Background and Preparation
To prepare for this session, read all the readings.
Wisdom 12:13, 16–19
Psalm 86:5–6, 9–10, 15–16
Romans 8:26–27
Matthew 13:24–43 [or (short form) 13:24–30]
Spend a few minutes reflecting on what these readings mean for you today.
Is there a particular reading that appeals to you? Is there a word or
image that engages you?
Read the following Word in Liturgy and Catholic Doctrine
sections. Read the Word in Liturgy and Catholic Doctrine sections. These
give you background on what you will be doing this session. Read over
the session outline and make it your own. Check to see what materials
you will need.
The Word In Liturgy
The Book of Wisdom ascribes authorship to Solomon, but in actuality it
was written (probably in Greek) in the first century before the birth
of Jesus, most likely in Alexandria, Egypt. The book’s audience,
then, was the Jewish community of the diaspora, educated in Hellenistic
thought, and always in danger of being won over by the erudition of pagan
philosophers. The author writes to strengthen the faith of his fellow
Jews, taking up many of the perennial questions of the philosophers (such
as the problem of evil) from the perspective of Jewish faith as well as
human reason.
The section from which today’s reading is taken (11:2–19:4)
is part of a longer commentary on the events of the Exodus. Here, the
author digresses to consider God’s treatment of sinners. Why are
sinners allowed to prosper, while God’s faithful ones seem to suffer?
The answer that the author gives comes from a deep meditation on the Jewish
scriptures which reveal a God of mercy and compassion, “slow to
anger, abounding in kindness” (Psalm 86:15). God permits the sinner
to survive with an eye to the possibility of repentance. Despite the divine
power (“you are master of might”) that could simply crush
all evil, Yahweh has been shown to be a God of “much lenience”
(Psalm 86:18).
Today’s gospel reading continues where last week’s left off
and is still part of the larger unit in Matthew 13 known as the “Discourse
in Parables” in which the evangelist has collected a series of seven
parables focused on the kingdom. The three parables that are part of today’s
reading all address the perplexing reality that Jesus (and the kingdom
he announced) seemed to tolerate the presence of moral evil. This attitude
seemed scandalous to some, both in Jesus’ day and in the early community
of Matthew. The answer given to this “problem of evil” both
by Jesus and Matthew is that God wishes to allow time for repentance and
further growth. The excruciatingly gradual progress and seemingly insignificant
size of the kingdom is not remarkable and in fact mirrors the natural
phenomena of wheat, mustard seeds, and leaven. But all three parables
promise an eschatological resolution to the dilemma, both in the fantastic
growth that lies ahead and in the judgment reserved for the Lord alone
in the final days.
Catholic Doctrine
The Problem of Moral Evil
What does it mean to categorize evil as moral? The Church is seeking by
this terminology to distinguish between the evil we do and the physical
evil that is not our personal responsibility, such as an earthquake that
tragically kills innocent individuals. The particular set of scriptures
the Church assigns to this Sunday emphasizes that there is a type of evil
we choose to engage in, either by action or inaction, and at the end times
all be judged accordingly. The idea of moral evil rests upon the foundation
of free choice. The Church believes that human beings are accountable
and therefore move toward their final destiny by their choice, through
the exercise of their free will (CCC 311). Any recounting of history provides
ample proof that men and women have sinned against God and neighbor.
While acknowledging the existence of moral evil from a very early point
in Christian history, our greatest theologians have asserted that God
is neither directly nor indirectly responsible for the cause of moral
evil in the world. The responsibility for choosing other than the good
does not belong to God, but to human beings.
God is neither directly nor indirectly the author or cause of evil; God
is always “on our side,” championing the good in us, and working
for our well-being. The provident goodness of God works for good in everything,
including those events and actions when we choose to do wrong. The worst
wrong that humanity ever could possibly engage in, that is, the rejection,
torture, and execution of God’s only Son, innocent and without sin,
brought about the most amazing of all goods: the glory of the anointed,
the Christ, and humanity’s redemption (CCC 312). God came among
us in order to free us from that bondage into which we had sunk.
In any discussion of evil, whether physical or moral evil, the question
must be asked: why does evil exist at all? Why would not a good God simply
create a world without the possibility of evil? The Church points out
that, in the end, the resolution of this question is achieved only by
the totality of faith. There is no quick or simple answer.
|